Showing posts with label " Induced Pluripotent stem cells". Show all posts
Showing posts with label " Induced Pluripotent stem cells". Show all posts

Monday, December 8, 2025

Clinical Trials Show Promise for Parkinson's Cell Therapy


Stem cell therapy for Parkinson's disease has reached a critical turning point, with multiple clinical trials demonstrating that transplanting dopamine-producing neurons into patients' brains can be done safely and may alleviate the motor symptoms that define this progressive neurological disorder. Two major phase 1 trials published in Nature during 2025 tested different stem cell sources, one using induced pluripotent stem cells derived from adult blood in Japan, and another using human embryonic stem cells in a collaboration between researchers at UC Irvine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, and the University of Toronto. Both studies involved surgical transplantation of early stage dopamine-producing cells directly into the putamen, a brain region critical for movement control. The trials enrolled a total of 19 participants with Parkinson's, all of whom received varying dose of the cellular therapy. Remarkably, after 18 to 24 months of follow-up, neither study reported serious adverse events related to the cell transplants, no tumor formation, and no dyskinesias induced by the transplanted cells; complications that had plagued earlier attempts at cell therapy decades ago. 

Beyond establishing safety, both trials showed preliminary evidence of therapeutic benefit. In the Japanese trial using induced pluripotent stem cells, brain imaging revealed an average 44.7% increase in dopamine activity in the putamen, with participants in the higher-dose group experiencing the most substantial gains. Most participants demonstrated measurable improvements in movement symptoms whether they were on or off their regular Parkinson's medications. The North American trial using human embryonic stem cells reported similar findings: imaging studies confirm that transplanted cell survived and integrated into brain tissue even after immunosuppression medications were discontinued at 12 months, and participants receiving higher doses should an average 23-point improvement in their Parkinson's rating scale scores when off medication. While these improvements varied among individuals and require validation in larger studies, the consistency of results across different stem cell sources suggests the underlying biological principle is sound.

The genetic and regenerative medicine implications of this work extend well beyond Parkinson's treatment. These trials represent some of the most advanced applications of pluripotent stem cell technology in human neurodegenerative disease, demonstrating that scientists can guide stem cells to differentiate into specific neuron types and successfully integrate them into complex neural circuits. The University of Wisconsin's preliminary work using autologous induced pluripotent stem cells, cells derived from patient's own tissue, offers an additional advantage by potentially eliminating the need for long-term immunosuppression, though this approach requires personalized cell manufacturing for each patient. At phase three trials prepared to launch later in 2025 including UC Irvine's Alva Clinic the field stands at the threshold of potentially transforming Parkinson's from a disease management medications that lose effectiveness over time into one where neural networks can be rebuilt through a single surgical procedure the shift from symptomatic management to regenerative repair represents a fundamental reimagining of how neurodegenerative diseases might be treated in the coming decades.

Sources:

“Cell Therapy for Parkinson’s Shows Promise.” School of Medicine and Public Health, 16 Oct. 2025, www.med.wisc.edu/news/cell-therapy-for-parkinsons/.

“Stem-Cell Therapy Is a ‘big Leap’ for Parkinson’s Treatment.” UCI Health, 16 Apr. 2025, www.ucihealth.org/about-us/news/2025/04/parkinsons-study-nature.

“Two New Trials Explore Stem-Cell Therapy for Parkinson’s.” Parkinson’s Foundation, 8 May 2025, www.parkinson.org/blog/science-news/cell-replacement.



Friday, November 23, 2018

Bio Artificial Anterior Cruciate Ligaments Created (ACL) from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (IPSCs) and Stem Cells from Adipose Tissue (fat tissue)

Stem cell use  has been a highly debated clinical technique due to some of the unethical methods of retrieving the stem cells. Stem cells are widely thought of as blank cells that are used to create and reproduce any type of cell in the body and are made from human embryos. They are thought of being unethical due to their source being the human embryo. The debate on this topic has caused the technique to become illegal. However, there are a few other types of stem cells that are thought of more ethical and for this reason are able to be used clinically in a legal manner. In the study “Generation of stem cell-based bioartificial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts for effective ACL rupture repair” conducted by Dimitrios Kouroupis et al. They use two different sources for Multipotential Stromal Cells (MSCs). Adipose Tissue (AT) is commonly known as fat tissue and is one source for MSCs while the other source is biologically engineered. Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells(IPSCs) are blank slates created from recombinating ordinary cells from the patient. Both of these MSCs were used to engineer a Bio Artificial ACL.
An Anterior Cruciate Ligament graft is made up of two different types of connective tissue but split into 3 sections, the tendon itself, and then the two bone fragments at the ends to be inserted into the femur and tibia. So the bioartificial ACL was constructed with those parameters in mind. By growing cultures of these MSCs on a biomaterial medium the Bio Artificial ACL developed over time to become fully functioning. Through a PET-CT scan the graft that was inserted into the swine patient was shown to be metabolically active. This technique of creating Bio Artificial ACLs over using the patients own body to harvest a graft proves to have less morbidity and A shorter rehabilitation time. Through a patellar tendon graft the patient can have from 5-24 months recovery before the graft becomes fully woven into the body's composition. However many issues can occur during the process of harvesting the patellar tendon graft. Therefore if this new method using MSCs proves to be beneficial over normal ACL grafts then it could be a huge leap in the clinical field.
Ryohei Uchida, Shuji Horibe, and Norimasa Nakamura did more research on the effect of IPSCs and MSCs had on ACL repair. The difference between the two studies is that in this one they used Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) which are derived from bone marrow. This study focused on the results of trying to repair a partially torn ACL by injecting the IPSCs and MSCs into rabbits who through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were found to have partially torn ACLs. Results showed that the the ACL reconstruction done using MSCs had better functioning biomechanical properties than what resulted from regular ACL reconstruction. I feel that resources should be invested into human trials for this new technique for ACL reconstruction and ACL repair. If proven to be a more beneficial and more efficient technique then it could also be used for many injuries to the body.

Generation of stem cell-based bioartificial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts for effective ACL rupture repair



Sunday, March 18, 2018

Stem Cell Therapy


 The Potential of stem cells in the treatment of traumatic brain injuries

Image result for TBI

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a global public health concern, with limited treatment options available. In the U.S alone, between 3.2 -5.3 million people suffer long-term cognitive impairment as a result of TBI. When an individual has sustained a heavy blow to the head it could lead to long-term deficits involving sensory-motor and memory functions. However, the brain harbors neural stem cells that it uses to self-repair itself after damages have been sustained. Unfortunately, these neural stem cells are limited and if the impact to the head was strong it would result in a chronic injury. Therefore the brain would not be able to have a full recovery which would result in future health problems for an individual. As of today, many scientists have begun working with stem cells in hopes of finding a treatment for TBI.
Embryonic and Induced Pluripotent stem cells have acquired a lot of population due to there plasticity and ability to differentiate into any lineage in the nervous central system. Embryonic stem cells (ES) are obtained from fetal or embryonic brains and are strongly considered for neural transplantation because when implanted into a recipients brain these cells can differentiate, migrate, and make innervation to aid the damaged brain to recover. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are obtained from patients themselves and have the potential for autologous transplantation and avoiding ethical and graft rejection concerns. Induced pluripotent stem cells have allowed scientists to explore manipulating this highly plastic population. These somatic cell-derived iPSCs can provide large quantities of pluripotent cells that have high plasticity generating cells for all three germ layers including neurons and glial cells.
These unique properties of Embryonic and Induced pluripotent stem cells have raised hope that many neurological diseases including TBI might be cured or treated.

  Image result for embryonic stem cells

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29372464

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/795390