Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Students Exploring Own Genetic Data Improved Class Knowledge

           




A study performed by Stanford University Medical Center showed that students who studied their own genetic data faired better then those who studied random genetic data. These students improved their knowledge of class materials by an average of 31 percent compared to those who did not undergo genetic testing. Kelly Ormond, co-author of the study and associate professor of genetics said, "There is always a lot of interest in whether personalized learning can influence education. ... What our study shows is that it might have benefits for some self-selected students, and is worthy of cautious consideration."

Keyan Salari, MD, PhD, a former student of Stanford created the idea after exploring his interest in his own genetic testing and saw the educational benefits. By exploring your own genome, one can learn their health risks and what responses to drugs that might be predicted. "For instance, I learned I might have a higher risk for age-related macular degeneration. That led me to read and learn a lot more about the genetics of that disease than I probably would have otherwise," said Salari. Encouraging students to explore their own genome could help improve their knowledge of genetics in general.

The study also showed that 83 percent of the students who underwent personal testing were pleased with their decision. 70 percent of those who underwent the testing reported a better understanding of human genetics. A survey given after the course asked students if they had made any behavioral changes based on their findings in which some reported changes. Although in face-to-face study with the same students, no behavior changes were reported six months after the course was taken.



Studying your personal data can definitely help spark interest in a topic. Not only will it be beneficial to obtaining valuable personal knowledge but by exploring your own genome you could also choose healthy lifestyle choices by knowing what you’re susceptible to. Personally I feel that by studying my own genome rather then a random individuals, I would much more interesting in learning the subject simply because it’s beneficial to me to explore the stories hidden within my genome. It would influence me to develop a deeper understand had I otherwise studied random information. I would believe that by being more involved in studying my own data I would retain that knowledge better than I would have by studying randomly generated data out of a textbook.


Related Article Link: http://www.genomeweb.com/clinical-genomics/stanford-med-student-study-suggests-genotyping-option-improved-learning-personal

No comments:

Post a Comment