Showing posts with label "birth defects". Show all posts
Showing posts with label "birth defects". Show all posts

Monday, October 16, 2023

200-year-old DNA Helps Map Tiny Fly's Genetic Course to New lands, Modern Times

 


Researchers from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and Lund University analyzed DNA from fruit fly specimens collected in Europe between the early 19th century and the 1930s. Surprisingly, flies from the early 1800s were more genetically similar to contemporary flies than those from the 1930s, revealing patterns of migration and genetic drift. The study uncovered genes showing signs of evolutionary pressure, aiding in the adaptation to different environments and challenges. Notably, a gene called Cyp6g1 emerged in the 1930s specimens, making flies resistant to the pesticide DDT introduced in the 1940s. Another gene, Ahcy, helped 19th-century flies adapt to cooler temperatures and shorter days. Furthermore, the ChKov1 gene, previously linked to insecticide resistance, was found to offer viral resistance, altering prior understandings.

I find it so interesting that analyzing the DNA of fruit flies from centuries-old specimens, as highlighted in this research article, holds so much significance in the field of genetics. Research on fruit flies is critical because it also provides valuable insights into genetic mechanisms across various species, including humans. As noted in the second article, the fruit fly is a critical model organism in both basic and medical research, with a rapid reproductive rate and deep genetic similarities to mammals. Studies over the decades have revealed that its genetic mechanisms, like the Pax6 gene responsible for eye formation, are conserved across species and its mutations can cause various eye disorders. Overall, research on fruit flies has provided scientists with valuable insights into human gene functions, birth defects, and even complex conditions like alcoholism and drug addiction.

Links: 

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/10/231012161830.htm

https://www.upstate.edu/cvr/investigators/francesca-pignoni-phd/why-the-fly.php#:~:text=The%20fruit%20fly%C2%B7is%20a,control%20organ%20development%20in%20vertebrates.


Monday, April 16, 2018

Just how bad is it to have kids with your cousin?

Image result for darwin and his wife

Acoording to a research done by Yaniv Erlich a scientist at ColumbiaUniversity and the Chief science of officer of the DNA test company MyHeritage  have looked into determining at what point in history marrying your cousin was frown upon and the chance of a baby being born with birth defects due to consanguinity. In today society marriage between cousin is oddly viewed but in earlier times, cousins used to get hitched all the time. Such as Franklin Delano Roosevelts who married his fifth cousin Elenor or Albert Einstein and Charels Darwin who married their cousins too. From the 1650 to 1850 and individual on average was on average, fourth cousins with their spouse. By 1950 married couples were on average seventh cousins, according to Erlich. There was more of an expansion between cousins marrying each other in a within a centuary beacuse before1950 most people married someone who lived within a six mile radius of where they were born. Of course other factors played a role in marriages between cousins which influenced families to marry between each other such as money, power and control of territory.
Now modern time many states moved to outlaw cousin marriage. Today 24 states ban marriage between first cousins, while 20 states allow it. The others allow first cousins to couple up, but only under certain circumstances which include only both are over 50 or 55 or 65. Depending on the state the marriage is allowed if one or both are permanently infertile and only if the couple has received genetic counseling. First cousin share 12.5 percent of their DNA while parents and kids share about 50 percernt. Therefore any child that results from first cosuin union will have a similar looking genes which can result in future problems. Its estimated that 4 to 7 percent of children born to first cousins are likely to have birth defects, compared o 3 to 4 percent for children whose parents are more distanltly related. The real issue would rise if the next generation of kids also married their first cousins because their offspring would have even more DNA in in common and an even greater chance for birth defects. Odds of healthy offspring improve with each distance of relation. Second cosuins share 6.25 percent og their genes and third cousins share just over 3 percent. Any further cousins for the most part have no meaningful genetic relation at all.

https://www.popsci.com/marrying-cousins-genetics

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/jul/04/marriage-first-cousins-birth-defects