Just like any field of study, genetics entails some pretty
controversial topics. One of the most debatable advances in genetics research
is the idea of physically modifying human embryos in order to create genetic
traits that can be passed down to future offspring. For many years it has been
difficult to define the ethical background of this technique. It is widely
feared that this technology could and would be used to enhance intelligence or
to create physical specimens to eventually serve as soldiers. This article
reports that an advisory group of scientists has endorsed gene editing in order
to alter/prevent babies from acquiring genes that cause serious disease when
there is no other alternative intervention. Human germ line engineering, as
this technique is called, will allow parents to have biological children
without passing on the genes for Huntington’s or Tay-Sachs disease, for
example.
I found
this article to be really relevant and interesting. To be able to alter genetic
traits in human embryos is an incredible advancement that should be used, but
only for the right reasons. As incredible as technology is becoming, who knows
what catastrophes could result from putting this type of power into the wrong
hands. This topic should not be taken lightly and should abide by a strict set
of ethical laws. Personally, I think any advancement is a good advancement. A
few years ago, this would have never even been thought to be possible. Now,
according to this article, “the National Academy of Sciences and the National
Academy of Medicine has lent its support for this once-unthinkable proposition”.
A related article says that China will develop
the first genetically enhanced super-humans using the same germ line
engineering technology.
I think there's nothing wrong with using genetics to improve the capabilities of human beings. Who wouldn't want smarter, stronger or better-looking child? Though I believe, in some cases this whole process is artificial.
ReplyDelete