![]() |
Rhinoceros beetle |
The explanation that the researchers came to was "weapons may evolve along with traits that let males make best use of them, offsetting survival costs". The only way, therefore, that the beetles' horns became so diverse and elaborate can be explained is by low cost. I'm not a big fan of bugs but I thought this was a very interesting article that elaborates how certain structures evolve with animals, just like with humans and our tail bones. If the horn size or the horn in general was a high cost, I'm guessing that the species wouldn't have been able to survive.
http://doi.org/n34
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.97207.x/abstract;jsessionid=BFC4CDFFA6AB4B4CD002C88CA0BF34E9.f01t01?deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=&userIsAuthenticated=false
Hey Melissa, I would like to elaborate on your last comment. I completely agree with that statement and I believe that there were a whole variety of horn sizes and shapes. The rhinoceros beetles that are common today are the ones that optimize their traits. More specifically, they compromised to have a horn that wasn't too extravagant, but enough to attract females. Secondly, it was big enough so that their flying, survival, and immune response would not be hindered. It is all about the survival of the fittest and it so happens that this variation did the best.
ReplyDelete