Sunday, March 10, 2013

Questionable Genomic Screening

Sci Daily & Medicalxpress.  Many people carry genetic mutations that occur in very low frequencies among populations. These include cancers and blood disorders. In the March addition of Genetics in Medicine ,UNC School of Medicine researchers propose genetic screening for healthy people for early prevention. To me, this sounds like a money making scheme, but hey, I'm no expert. However, James Evans, MD states that uncovering the individuals with rare needs due to the possible development of a genetic disorder is beneficial to the community. He goes on to state that DNA sequencing is affordable and it can detect diseases like Lynch Syndrome, an inherited cancer of the digestive system that afflicts over 600,000 people. Early detection finds this disease 80 percent risk for preventable cancers. So pay the cool $200 for an approximate .2 percent chance of finding the disease.

RNAi or RNA interference is the tool used for analysis of gene function. First used on Drosophila and mammalian cultured cells. This method sheds light on signal transduction, cancer biology, and host cell responses to infection. There is already different genetic testing variations such as carrier identification, prenatal diagnosis, newborn screening, late-onset disorders, and identification. Genetic disease or susceptibility can have implications for employment and insurance. Therefore, handling this information is important in terms of privacy. Obtaining and documenting this information can have an impact on an individuals life, negative and potentially positive for roughly 2 percent of the population.

3 comments:

  1. People will do anything for a buck. That's pretty sad that professionals who are supposed to be HELPING us (the general public) are actually using us for profit. Is the economy seriously that bad that they need to be screening vulnerable, healthy inindividuals unnecessarily? Talk about a rip off. Sorry, but 0.2% doesn't sound very promising.... Haha.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The percentages don't appear to outweigh the betterment of the masses. If said genetic screen does in fact find a severe genetic issue at birth how and who determine the overall outcome for the child.? The cost of insurances at that moment not to mention the cost further down the life span of the child if they live assuredly will be a financial ruin. It is unfortunate that our society finds solice in the high cost for knowledge but offers no recourse ---wow how much would that cost?

    ReplyDelete