tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3360356351594869925.post7512891303764288363..comments2024-03-27T11:48:14.557-04:00Comments on Punnett's Square: G. F. Barbatohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09416043925683981826noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3360356351594869925.post-26983101539974056332016-05-05T00:53:24.237-04:002016-05-05T00:53:24.237-04:00I was intrigued about this article and personally ...I was intrigued about this article and personally read it myself after seeing your post, and I completely agree with your opinion. Linking age at which we lose our virginity to the genetic variations in our DNA sounds pretty far-fetched. I mean I don't fully disagree on some of the statistical analysis, a correlation between the genetic variant and its common occurrence in people who had kids at an early age is interesting and something to consider. But this study is only paying attention to the action of people losing their virginity at a young age, how does this study pertain to people who don't lose their virginity until a much later age? I feel like something so arbitrary of losing your virginity can't be linked to something so concrete as the genetic sequences in our DNA. Kate Butulanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15824783097577757615noreply@blogger.com